Blue Hydrogen | Lummus Technology

Lummus'' hydrogen technology provides solutions for both conventional hydrogen and blue hydrogen production. Conventional hydrogen production emits CO2, produced from reactions and combustion, to the atmosphere. Blue hydrogen production captures the CO2 and stores or utilizes it in a down-stream process. This hydrogen technology is part

Blue hydrogen: Current status and future technologies

However, blue hydrogen, produced from fossil fuels with CO 2 capture, is currently viewed as the bridge between the high-emission grey hydrogen and the limited-scale zero-emission green hydrogen. This review highlights the features of different commercially deployed and new emerging hydrogen production processes from fossil

Blue hydrogen | Shell Global

The Shell Blue Hydrogen Process is an end-to-end lineup that enables affordable responsible hydrogen production. By applying proven carbon capture technologies, natural gas operators and those in the chemical and refining sectors can diversify their product mix and become low-carbon energy producers.

3 Questions: Blue hydrogen and the world''s energy

There are two ways to move toward cleaner hydrogen production. One is applying carbon capture and storage to the fossil fuel-based hydrogen production processes. Natural gas-based hydrogen

Comparative assessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane

We investigated the costs and GHG emissions of three blue hydrogen production technologies. • Blue hydrogen cost ranges from $1.69-$2.55 per kg H 2 depending on the production technology.. Autothermal reforming (ATR) with carbon capture and storage (CCS) and natural gas decomposition with CCS produce H 2 has the lowest

A framework for assessing economics of blue hydrogen production

Hydrogen can be generated through various pathways, including ''green hydrogen'' from renewable electrolysis, ''grey/black hydrogen'' from fossil fuels where the CO 2 is released to the atmosphere and lastly ''blue hydrogen'', where the associated CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel production processes are safely mitigated [8].

Touted as clean, ''blue'' hydrogen may be worse than gas or coal

But Cornell and Stanford University researchers believe it may harm the climate more than burning fossil fuel. The carbon footprint to create blue hydrogen is more than 20% greater than using either natural gas or coal directly for heat, or about 60% greater than using diesel oil for heat, according to new research published Aug. 12 in Energy

The Future of Sustainable Energy: Blue Hydrogen Production

The production of blue hydrogen can be broken down into several key steps: Steam methane reforming (SMR) or autothermal reforming (ATR): Natural gas, primarily composed of methane (CH4), is combined with steam to create a mixture of hydrogen (H2) and carbon dioxide (CO2). In the ATR process, an additional oxidant is

Saudi Arabia''s Hydrogen Industrial Strategy

In addition, hydrogen from renewable energy sources ("green hydrogen") could mean a new industrial sector for Saudi Arabia, much of whose landmass is located in the sun belt and has vast areas of flat land for solar panels. The kingdom has announced plans to install about 27 gigawatts (GW) of mostly solar capacity by 2023 and almost 58

Blue Hydrogen

Policy recommendations to drive investment in clean hydrogen production. Blue hydrogen is well placed to kickstart the rapid increase in the utilisation of clean hydrogen for climate mitigation purposes but requires strong and sustained policy to incentivise investment at the rate necessary to meet global climate goals.

How can we deliver one of the fuels of the future? | Aramco

We employed the services of TÜV Rheinland, a leading independent testing, inspection and certification agency based in Germany, in order to obtain the world''s first independent certifications recognizing lower-carbon, ''blue'' hydrogen and ammonia production, and announced our intention to produce up to 11 million tons per annum of blue

3 Questions: Blue hydrogen and the world''s energy systems

A: Hydrogen is considered one of the key vectors for the decarbonization of hard-to-abate sectors such as heavy-duty transportation. Currently, more than 95 percent of global hydrogen production is fossil-fuel based. In the next decade, massive amounts of hydrogen must be produced to meet this anticipated demand.

Blue hydrogen: A fuel without a future | IEEFA

A fuel without a future. Despite industry claims, blue hydrogen — which is made from methane, a climate pollutant — is not the fuel of the future. Here''s why: The cost of blue hydrogen production is tied to volatile gas prices; Its production relies on costly carbon capture technology that has failed to meet the industry goal in real

How green is blue hydrogen?

The production of hydrogen from methane is an endothermic reaction and requires significant input of energy, between 2.0 and 2.5 kWh per m 3 of hydrogen, to provide the necessary heat and pressure. 18 This energy comes almost entirely from natural gas when producing gray hydrogen, and therefore, also presumably when producing

What is green hydrogen vs. blue hydrogen and why it matters

Green hydrogen could help us cut our carbon footprint, if it overcomes hurdles. Blue hydrogen is hydrogen produced from natural gas with a process of steam methane reforming, where natural gas is

blue hydrogen production

blue hydrogen production. Large-scale production of low-carbon hydrogen (known as blue hydrogen) is an important step towards reducing global carbon dioxide emissions. The technology is comparable with today''s grey hydrogen production from fossil fuels but includes additional carbon capturing and sequestration (CCS) to permanently remove

The hydrogen solution? | Nature Climate Change

Today, grey hydrogen costs around €1.50 kg –1, blue hydrogen €2–3 kg –1 and green hydrogen €3.50–6 kg –1. Consultants estimate that a €50–60 per tonne carbon price could make

Global Energy Perspective 2023: Hydrogen outlook | McKinsey

Blue hydrogen production is projected to be concentrated in regions with cost-competitive natural gas and CCUS, such as the Middle East and North America. By 2050, blue hydrogen production could require as much as around 500 billion cubic meters of natural gas (between 10 and 15 percent of global natural gas demand in the Further

HYDROGEN FACT SHEET: PRODUCTION OF LOW-CARBON

although others disagree.9 The price difference between grey and blue hydrogen is predicted to narrow with cheaper natural gas prices and a decline in the cost of CCUS.10 Table 1: Cost of hydrogen production in the US Hydrogen production method Cost low ($/kg) Cost high ($/kg) Cost mean ($/kg) SMR without CCS $1.05 $1.50 $1.29

Hydrogen Production | Department of Energy

The overall challenge to hydrogen production is cost. DOE''s Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office is focused on developing technologies that can produce hydrogen at $2/kg by 2026 and $1/kg by 2031 via net-zero-carbon pathways, in support of the Hydrogen Energy Earthshot goal of reducing the cost of clean hydrogen by 80% to $1 per 1

Grey, blue, green – the many colours of hydrogen

2 · Depending on production methods, hydrogen can be grey, blue or green – and sometimes even pink, yellow or turquoise – although naming conventions can vary across countries and over time. But green hydrogen

Blue hydrogen: Current status and future technologies

Concerning blue hydrogen production, the conventional technologies, such as steam methane reforming (SMR) and coal gasification, have been utilized by the

The Key Differences Between Green Hydrogen and Blue Hydrogen

In summary, while both green and blue hydrogen play roles in the clean energy landscape, green hydrogen offers a more sustainable and long-term solution due to its zero-emission production process. Blue hydrogen, with its reliance on fossil fuels and CCS, is a step towards reducing emissions but is not the end goal in the quest for a fully

Blue Hydrogen: Not Clean, Not Low Carbon, Not a Solution

blue hydrogen production based on current scientific knowledge of methane emissions and hydrogen leakage rates and the existing status of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies. This report focuses on the production of blue hydrogen from methane; a subsequent report will examine hydrogen from coal gasification.

Hydrogen production

As of 2023, less than 1% of dedicated hydrogen production is low-carbon, i.e. blue hydrogen, green hydrogen, and hydrogen produced from biomass. [11] In 2020, roughly 87 million tons of hydrogen was produced [12] worldwide for various uses, such as oil refining, in the production of ammonia through the Haber process, and in the

THE SHELL BLUE HYDROGEN PROCESS

via electrolysis has a similar efficiency to blue hydrogen production, but the levellised cost of production is significantly higher for electrolysis at €66/MWh compared with €47/MWh for SMR–CCUS [Ref 9]. In addition, it is widely acknowledged that scaling up blue hydrogen production will be easier than delivering green hydrogen.

Touted as clean, ''blue'' hydrogen may be worse than gas

But Cornell and Stanford University researchers believe it may harm the climate more than burning fossil fuel. The carbon footprint to create blue hydrogen is more than 20% greater than using either natural

Worldwide greenhouse gas emissions of green hydrogen

5 · a–d, The shaded areas indicate emission ranges for hydrogen production from steam methane reforming (grey H 2) and from steam methane reforming combined with